Professor, Urban and Environmental Policy and Planning (UEPP), Virginia Tech; Joann Boughman Innovation Fellow at USG; Acting Director, Center for Future of Work Places and Practices (CFWPP); Head of Outreach and Engagement, Center for European and Transatlantic Studies (CEUTS)
Please join us on Friday, December 5, 1:00–3:00 PM (EST) for an informational webinar exploring the intersection of agriculture and solar energy. Learn about:
Lessons from dual-use agrivoltaic projects
Solar policies & regulations affecting farmland
Soil & forage research on solar sites
Planned Speakers & Topics:
Virginia’s HB 206 & Mitigation Options Update: Jonathan Rak & Amber Foster (Virginia DEQ), Dr. Lee Daniels (VT SPES)
Soils & Forage Research Updates: Dr. Ryan Stewart & Dr. John Fike (VT SPES)
Agrivoltaic Programs Review: Dr. Ralph Hall (VT Urban and Environmental Policy & Planning)
Project Experiences & Updates: Dr. Joseph Haymaker & Thomas Eno (VT Eastern Shore Agricultural Research & Extension Center), David Specca (Rutgers University), Austin Counts (Appalachian Voices), Eric Bronson (James River Grazing), Ashish Kapoor & Teddy Pitsiokos (Piedmont Environmental Council)
The session will be recorded, and a link to the recording will be shared with all registrants.
This is a great opportunity for farmers, researchers, policymakers, and anyone interested in sustainable energy and agriculture to learn, connect, and explore new approaches in the rapidly evolving field of agrivoltaics.
Please share this announcement with colleagues or friends who may be interested in the topic.
This new initiative offers Virginia Tech early- and mid-career faculty a unique opportunity to:
Advance their research in close collaboration with one of the Smart Healthcare Hub teams.
Receive mentorship from senior faculty across CFWPP and the SHH.
Access cutting-edge research infrastructure accessible to the SHH at the Virginia Tech–Carilion School of Medicine in Roanoke.
Contribute to shaping the future of healthcare work and technology.
The Smart Healthcare Hub is advancing research at the intersection of healthcare, technology, and human-centered systems, with focus areas in:
AI as a tool for human-centered healthcare delivery
Healthcare data privacy and cybersecurity
Immersive simulation and gaming as a tool for clinical training and patient learning
The development of a Naturalistic Clinical Interaction Database (NCID)
Aligned with these themes, the CFWPP brings together technology, design, policy, and economics to explore the future of work, workplaces, and processes, with an emphasis on workforce development, responsible use of technology at work, and sustainable, health-focused work environments.
Formal engagement with SHH research teams and CFWPP leadership
Engagement in the 2026 AI and Health Conference at Virginia Tech’s Academic Building One in Alexandria
Support to pursue external funding and expand research impact
Eligibility & Application
The program seeks early- and mid-career Virginia Tech faculty eager to apply their disciplinary expertise to healthcare and the future of work. Priority will be given to proposals with strong potential for external funding, scholarly recognition, and broader impact. Applicants must submit:
The motivation for the 2024 agrivoltaics summit stemmed from Virginia’s growing need to balance the conservation of agricultural land with the rapid expansion of renewable energy, particularly solar power. As land-use conflicts, economic pressures on rural communities, and the need for climate resilience intensify, agrivoltaics offers a promising solution by enabling the dual-use of land for both farming and solar energy production. The agrivoltaics summit aimed to define strategies for collaboration between industry and state agencies to support agrivoltaics during the renewable energy transition, explore opportunities and challenges from diverse perspectives, and establish a network dedicated to evaluating and advancing agrivoltaics opportunities relevant to Virginia stakeholders.
KEY FINDINGS
Farmers are open to agrivoltaics but stress the importance of balancing solar development with protecting prime agricultural land and maintaining long-term farming viability.
Early community engagement and overcoming regulatory hurdles are key to successful solar projects, with long-term benefits expected from environmentally responsible, community-focused designs.
Utility companies face challenges with grid connection for solar projects but see opportunities for collaboration with local communities to support renewable energy integration.
Clear policies, financial incentives, and collaboration among stakeholders are essential to protect farmland while promoting the sustainable development of agrivoltaics in Virginia.
Acknowledgements: This research was supported by a grant from the 4-VA program.
Recommended citation: CAIA, CFWPP, & PEC (2025). Advancing Agrivolatics in Virginia. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg.
Congratulations to Dr. Sadhana Manthapuri who I had the privilege of hooding this afternoon at the Virginia Tech Graduate School Commencement Ceremony.
It has been a true pleasure to work with Sadhana over the past four years. She has a passion for her research and an incredible work ethic that enabled her to explore almost every facet of the concept of urban DNA. I have copied the abstract from her dissertation below to provide a sense of the scope of her research.
Sadhana’s contributions at Virginia Tech extended beyond her dissertation. She taught two courses—Land Use and Environment and Renewable Energy Systems—sharing her knowledge and enthusiasm with our undergraduate students. She also served as a graduate research assistant with the Center for Economic and Community Engagement, enriching her academic experience with applied research. Internationally, she has presented her research at urban conferences in Spain and London, and was interviewed by Prof. Greg Clark (CBE) as part of his DNA of Cities podcast.
Outside of Virginia Tech, Sadhana was selected for the prestigious 2024 Mayoral Fellowship Program in the City of Detroit. In this program, she worked closely with the crime and violence intervention team, explored a range of policy issues, and regularly engaged with Mayor Mike Duggan. Before that, Sadhana spent her 2023–24 winter break developing an economic revitalization plan for Philadelphia’s 7th Ward, earning second place in the Edmund N. Bacon Urban Design Competition.
I highlight these experiences not just to list her accomplishments, but to illustrate the breadth of her engagement during her time at Virginia Tech. Sadhana seized every opportunity to grow, lead, and contribute—both in the classroom and in communities across the country.
Congratulations again, Dr. Manthapuri!
Abstract
This dissertation examined the concept of Urban DNA from both theoretical and practical perspectives. While urban scholars frequently use the term “urban DNA” in their discussions, many theoretical aspects and applications remain unresolved. In the post pandemic world, as an increasing number of cities are keen to explore their unique urban DNA and leverage this for effective branding, there is a need to understand what urban DNA is. However, there is a lack of comprehensive step-by-step guidance available to urban planners and policymakers on how urban DNA can facilitate the urban development process.
To bridge this gap, a bibliometric review of existing literature was conducted to gain insights into how scholars have framed the concept of urban DNA. This review highlights the strengths and weaknesses of various narratives of urban DNA, thereby providing a more comprehensive understanding of the topic. To establish the urban DNA theoretical framework, 17 different urban development and evolutionary theories were studied to understand what factors could define the genetic essence of cities and how a development transition could occur. Regulation and urban niche theory emerged as the two most effective frameworks due to their ability to explain urban uniqueness, as well as the temporal and spatial variations, growth, and stability that occur across different cycles of urban development.
To validate the regulation and urban niche DNA model, interviews were conducted with the directors of the economic and planning departments across seven tech hubs, aiming to understand how the unique characteristics of these cities evolved over the past two decades. The analysis revealed that, despite notable differences in their economic identities and growth trajectories, the interviewees consistently identified similar regulatory and niche factors as the foundational elements of the cities’ genetic essence. Additional urban DNA mechanisms linked with sectoral, temporal, and spatial interplay were also captured. Drawing from the findings of the qualitative approach, a preliminary vector autoregression framework was developed to quantitatively visualize the DNA of a city and understand the impacts of the phenomenon of addition, substitution, and deletion of genetic elements on the evolution of cities using San Francisco to present the ideas.
We are pleased to release an infographic and report of the main findings from the 2023 Virginia Tech Student Food Access and Wellbeing Survey. This research was made possible by the 2023 CALS Strategic Plan Advancement Integrated Internal Competitive Grants Program.
Main Findings
A little over a third (34.51%) of student respondents can be classified as being food insecure (having a low or very low food security status).
Around 2 out of 10 respondents (22.63%) were found to be experiencing transient or chronic reductions in food intake and disrupted eating patterns.
Both undergraduate and graduate students had comparable levels of food insecurity (33.81% vs. 35.71%, respectively).
Those students most at risk of having a low or very low food security status include international students and Black or African American and Hispanic or Latino students.
If you are a Virginia Tech student and are in need of food assistance, please consider the following two options.
Option 1: If you find it difficult, for whatever reason, to obtain a sufficient quantity of healthy food each week, please complete this food assistance form in theDean of Students’ office.
Option 2: If you find yourself in a moment of need, please consider visiting The Market of Virginia Tech during the following open hours to access a variety of non-perishable items. No prior intake or registration is required.
Tuesdays: 9:30–11:30 a.m.
Thursdays: 4:30–7 p.m.
Fridays: 9–11:30 a.m.
This past spring semester, Dr. Chanit’a Holmes, Dr. Sarah Misyak, and I ran the first ever Virginia Tech Employee Food Access and Wellbeing Survey. We are currently analyzing the survey responses and plan to release our preliminary findings later this semester.
The application for the 2024-2025 F.I.R.E. (Forging Interest in Research and Engagement) Starters program is now open to Virginia Tech undergraduates (specifically, rising sophomores and/or students with junior standing, or students with at least 2 years remaining at Virginia Tech).
As a global land-grant institution, Virginia Tech is committed to serving individuals and society and improving the quality of life for all. The realization of this vision rests on our ability to advance transdisciplinary research that is informed by a diverse array of lived experiences. The purpose of the F.I.R.E. Starters program is to:
increase diversity in undergraduate research at Virginia Tech,
increase access to foundational research training,
connect students with faculty research mentors, and
prepare students for independent and collaborative research, competitive summer research opportunities, and other undergraduate research experiences.
Students in all disciplines – especially in the humanities and social sciences – are encouraged to apply.
Our new paper entitled “Systematic investigation of inadequate food access at a large southeastern land grant university,” is now available at PLOS ONE.
Abtract: Over the past decade, the impact of low food security on student well-being and academic performance has become a growing concern at institutions of higher education across the U.S. This mixed methods study adds to the growing body of evidence on the association between student socio-demographic and economic characteristics and food security. An online survey covering food access, student well-being, and housing security was sent to 35,337 undergraduate and graduate students at a large southeastern land grant university. A total of 2,116 complete responses were received; a 6% response rate. The survey responses also included 176 written statements by students. The survey found that 16% of both undergraduate and graduate students had low or very low food security, as defined by a modified USDA food security measure. The socio-demographic and economic characteristics that were linked to a higher likelihood of low food security included: having a GPA of less than 3.0, having a disability, being an international student, being a first-generation student, being a transfer student, going into debt to pay for food, being a Black or African American student, having poor mental health, having uncertain living arrangements, and having no medical insurance. Recommendations for enhancing student access to food, housing, and mental health services are discussed.
On March 13 at 2pm, the Center for Future Work Places and Practices (CFWPP) will welcome Dr. Alan Tomkins – the Acting Division Director of the NSF’s Social and Economic Sciences (SES) Directorate – to Virginia Tech as part of its speaker series. In this presentation, Dr. Tomkins will talk about NSF’s grant process and Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences (SBE) programs, provide tips for writing a competitive proposal, and discuss different types of grants.
Please register hereto join the talk in person or remotely.
Congratulations to Shahidur Rashid Talukdar for successfully defending his PhD dissertation entitled “Policy conflicts among local government officials: How does officials’ engagement with regional governance relate to their position divergence on sustainability policy?” The abstract for his dissertation is provided below.
Policy conflict plays an important role in shaping public policy—both as a process and as a product. The policy conflict framework—a relatively novel theoretical framework, developed by Christopher Weible and Tanya Heikkila in 2017—considers position divergence among policymakers a key characteristic of policy conflict, which can be affected several factors including organizational and network affiliation of policymakers. This dissertation analyzes position divergence among local and regional officials over community sustainability policy, with a focus on affordable housing, which is a major concern of community sustainability. This research examines if, and how, local government officials’ engagement with regional governance can play a role in shaping their policy positions. Understanding what influences officials’ policy positions is essential in managing conflicts that arise in the making of sustainability policies in general and affordable housing policies, in particular.
This study argues that local government officials’ engagement with regional governance can lower policy position divergence among them by influencing their policy core beliefs and policy relevant knowledge. This analysis includes testing several hypotheses using data from a state-wide survey of local and regional policymakers. Employing cross-tabulations, multivariate regressions, and ordered logit analysis, this study finds that (a) policymakers share a wide range of policy positions on community sustainability policies and (b) for local government officials engaged with regional governance, position divergence on community sustainability is lower than that among those who are not engaged with regional governance. Although position divergence on affordable housing among those engaged with regional governance is generally lower than those who are not engaged with regional governance, this finding is not robust. In some regions and localities, the relationship between position divergence and engagement with regional governance does not hold.
Furthermore, this study finds that local government officials’ engagement with regional governance is associated with higher levels of policy relevant knowledge, which can influence the policymakers’ policy positions. Policy core beliefs do not have a statistically significant relationship with policymakers’ engagement with regional governance. The analysis suggests that local government officials’ policy core beliefs may not be affected by their engagement with regional governance.